Negative immunity (youtube.com)
‘All concluded that the net benefit was negative. That there was more problems from having the vaccines than there were benefits from having the vaccine.’
One obfuscating information is that when the vaccines were first administered, they recorded results for 2 months, but then, even after years, and after multiple ‘boosters’ (which have the second one maybe has an efficacy of 25% that of the first, etc), they still published the original results for efficacy (the results from after the first 2 months), and said Look how effective this is.
The efficacy of a vaccine on a completely naive (biologically) population (ie that has no exposure of any form to a virus) is different from the efficacy on an already-exposed population, and they ‘sell’ the vaccine based on data of its effect on a naive population, which there are none.