In conversation with Mark Cuban (youtube.com)
Sacks in his fully converted form to political pundit. Lol.
This is an example why such divisive politics results in negatives. If you have calmer politicians actually weighing and debating options, the people supporting them also tend to have to talk about options, which are nuanced and force people to entertain other opinions and discussion. No one feels like they know the answer. ... Here we are with divided politics, and it results in further divided and self-championing candidates (or parties). When regular people debate, they have to attack and raise criticism of their non-preferred candidate rather than admit faults of their own and discuss policy. It's maybe scary seeing someone who's usually so incisive and omnicritical to be so much an emotional guarddog of a political alliance. It took over the entire pod. But Sacks seems to be afraid of an idea that could reflect critically on Trump even being allowed to be aired, he jumps in each time before the guest even makes a single point.
The Republican party is now the Trump family business, and you don't hear from any of the other candidates or figures, and the Democrats have learned from this model, and Harris thinks she has to be the big personality and you don't hear from anyone in her party either, from Sanders or E Warren, and that's not unintential, said Cuban. There are no political parties anymore.