Why They All Resigned | Celina Caesar-Chavannes (youtube.com)
#Canada
There maybe are limits to how much you can abuse Canadians. Not meaningful ones, because Canadians will allow politicians and whoever to abuse them past any point they could repair the damage, but this might illustrate where they are.
In a week or so, there will be a new president elect. BTW Biden has basically not been in headlines, at least on my feeds, for months (I mean, a couple times only).
I hope Trump. I have the same criticisms of him as always. The largest being that 50% of the population (US and external) will sort of be self-banned from participating. They will have so much spite and also a great deal of false belief about facts about the man, thanks to the dems and also less so just thanks to the algorhythms on SM. Neither candidate is good, but fear of Democrats is much stronger than of Republicans. (Obviously below war risks and things) the most important thing in politicians for me is human and civil rights. Democrats I think you couldn't possibly win a debate trying to say they aren't against Constitutional rights, privacy rights, etc. Republicans, perhaps mostly because they have found themselves on the victim end of the manipulation of SM and politics, but it doesn't matter the reason, seem to have many avenues pushing for more rights. Not that Trump cares at all about rights, really, it seems. I think he would care, but he's maybe a simple man, and most people don't have a personality that lends them to think about rights.
Cuban is the only real standout thought leader who is currently giving pro-Harris speeches and interviews. Perhaps because he wants to run soon, and will run as a D.
‘Democrats have really alienated Arab Americans and Muslims.' John Zogby. I don't know if that's even true, but it does raise a question. Things are fine, even if you're currupt, as long as your corruption partners don't cause problems. But as soon as one does, you have to break with them to condemn their actions, or you have to allow yourself to be seen as obviously corrupt and lose integrity. You'll lose either one or both of the groups involved in the misbehavior. The only real option seems to just be on the side of justice all the time, and then your actions are seen as in that interest and not against any particular group or friend. Also, you can see the value of diversity and people in power not just all getting along, which results in harm to the commons and to justice. Problems like the China problem, the Israel problem, force people to look and choose. And they can choose either side. They'll usually choose the just side, I think, as long as they can access information.
Note for its absense. No one is talking about Harris being the second person of color possible president. No one is talking about her being the first woman. I never see it mentioned. When people (mostly from other countries who watch Liberal USA news) say America is a racist country, or has lots of racism in it.
...
One week for the election. New recordings published of Epstein in an interview with Michael Wolff.
‘He tells everybody what they want to hear.’
‘Anyone who he first tries to gain their trust, and then uses it to do bad things.’
...
It's a bit scary that a party that does this sort of thing (Democrats) might win. And also that a person we don't even really know, that we don't know as a person, that hasn't told us any of their policies, or has said that all her policy ideas from her career she suddenly no longer is going to go with. All this is a bit scary in a possible president.
If you're going to be president, shouldn't you want to win fair? Shouldn't you want to win without doing dirty tactics? Shouldn't you want the nation to know you and your policies and chose them? Shouldn't you want that if they don't, you shouldn't be elected?