This month we saw the start of the fight between citizens and tech/tech elite in the USA, with the refusal of a grand jury to convict a man who destroyed flock cameras. This means the rebellion is at least fairly widespread and permeated in the civilization. It also demonstrates an interesting point. The devices used by the tech-wielding controlling class are isolated from society, ie they can be destroyed in an isolated manner, a traditional challenge in modern protest. It also raises the issue that while a society (particularly a massively propagandized-and -lied-to and misled one) will often go along with oppressive and harmful laws and government for any amount of time, at some point the more illegitimite the laws and government have become, the more open they are when the idea of simply opposing cooperation starts, like when eveyrone hears you can just decide to not convict people for breaking the government's laws.
One of the books the government hates most is the little book on Jury Nullification by Clay Conrad. It's a very cheap book, but you can also just download the PDF from the Cato website