Invoking Emergencies Act against convoy protests was unreasonable, court rules - YouTubeInfringed 'Charter rights’. 2B Freedom of Expression. 8 Search and Seizure. Didn't find any infringement on Movement.
Finding was very different than the the ‘public inquiry’, the Merlo Commission which had found that what the government did was ok.
At the time, there was a lot of talk about the ‘CSIS defintion of a naitonal threat.’ Justice Mosley said it doesn't matter if CSIS says that, although it might have weight and be considered. ... The seizing and freezing of bank accounts affected people beyond those they were trying to affect. ... Unreasonable invocation of the Emergencies Act.
Judge said this is why it's important to have thes public interest litigants [CCLA] to bring these cases forward.
#Canada #HumanRights
The CCLA hadn't asked for costs or any remedy other than a declaration.
‘Canadian government’ expected to appeal.
What happens when a court finds a democratic government violates the Constitution? Can a person who is a PM/President retain authority after they have publicly broken the law against many people and violated a whole nation? and how can they hope to afterwards talk about other people as criminals?
Trudeau government has been saying that ‘economic harm’ can constitute ‘a national threat to Canada.’ Nope. ‘Gaslighting’
Court rules Trudeau's invocation of Emergencies Act was UNREASONABLE and UNCONSTITUTIONAL - YouTube Government lost on all measures, not just one. Everything they did, basically, was illegal (unconstitutional) (except perhaps againts Movement).
The Trudeau Regime Just Got a Whole Lot Worse - YouTubeFBI DEFIES Judge’s Order To Turn Over Seth Rich’s Laptop! - YouTubeSupreme Court may reel in power of federal agencies in major case - YouTubeMedicine, air quality. Who has power to decide? The government-created agencies or the courts, in deciding how to interpret laws? Fishing agency forces fishing boats to carry a government observer on their boat and to pay for it. Currently, courts defer to these types of agencies. ‘That’s where the government almost automatically wins. The government's argument just has to be within the realm of acceptibility, the realm of plausibility.' But the fishermen are saying the agency is overstepping. Lower judges are instructed they have to rule in the government's favor. 40-year precedent. Decision expected in June.
Healthcare, things won't ‘move as smoothly.’
#CivilRights
We investigated the German farmer protests - YouTubeSupreme Court Vacates Rulings Against Vaccine Mandates - YouTube