https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZyivuT2ek
Walmart went with Lilo and Missy Eliot.
Billie Eilish in headlines for ‘bravely’ fighing body shaming by taking her shirt of and being in just a bra. Of course, the headlines were mocked. Is this a PC-advised way to transition (with as much of the fanbase as possible) to being more sexy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAze0l2MDGI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO4eNTWxt4A
Proposals from 3 bidders, reportedly.
SBF took the stand, without the jury present, by his own choice. (Some time ago he'd also commented that he regretted filing bankrupcy that he knew he had the right to not do so but he'd be pressured to by his advisors or whoever, and that he only had his own self to blame.)
SBF had been started to be painted by other people. I guess this can happen when you stay silent (which happens during legal proceedings, or when you don't want to be baited by unworthy intentions to engage with people of higher value). He's been painted as a fake genius who put on his famous appearance to look like a tech savant, etc. But now it seems he's showing who he is and speaking for himself, and I haven't heard any real missteps. He's blamed himself for errors, but hasn't of course taken any gratuitous contrition. To me he comes off as a scientist or engineer, dealing with things rationally, but it appears he has no malevolent or particularly avaricious intentions. Now people say he'll get destroyed by cross examination. They point out he hasn't been forthcoming on some of the things he was asked about, saying he didn't recall with confidence.
Whatever happens in the trial now, on the other side of it SBF still is a person worth listening to and believing and seeing what he does. He retains his integrity, and maybe gets a bit more for chosing to speak for himself and by speaking show normal intentions, rather than playing law and hunkering down.
SBF was convicted on all counts. People are saying the prosecution really went after him, but some have already raised the counter that the prosecution handed out plea deals and things left and right, and might have really only been going after SBF. Also, there might be something worth noting about SBF being a non legal(read:insincere and advantage-seeking) type of defendant. He's spoken openly and sincerely, not at all guardedly, to it seems everyone, including vloggers and the court. This is the kind of defendant its pretty easy for a prosecution to tear up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTcXsBkQ11M
SBF used a company that links up investors with celebs, like K5, “a one-stop shop for relationships.” SBF paid hundreds of millions to K5 and expressed the possibility of investing up to $1b.
“He is probably the most connected person I've ever met. At his dinner at his house were Hilary Clinton, Doug Enhof, Katie Perry, Orlando Bloom, Kate Hudson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jeff Bezos, Ted Sorandos, Kendal, and Cory Gamble.”
He paid or was to pay $30m to Steph Curry, $50 for Tom Brady and Gizelle Bundchen, and $10m for Larry David to appear in his Superbowl commercial.
Alameda had a $65b line of credit with FTX.
Lalisa collabing with French burlesque club Crazy Horse. and will be performing 5 exclusive shows from 28 to 30 September.
She just turned down a $40m contract renewal for BlackPink.
The following statement can be attributed to Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) executive director Trevor Timm:
“The CIA is a disgrace. The fact that it contemplated and engaged in so many illegal acts against WikiLeaks, its associates, and even other award-winning journalists is an outright scandal that should be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department. The Biden Administration must drop its charges against Assange immediately. The case already threatens the rights of countless reporters. These new revelations, which involve a shocking disregard of the law, are truly beyond the pale.”
Trump, as everyone knows, called Assange a hero when he was running for pres, and people looked for him to pardon Assange before he left the White House, but he didn't, although he pardoned other people.
The US has been trying to have Assange extradited from England to the US for trial, and now people are asking if a nation can legally extradite someone if they had made plans to possibly kill them. Experts say the UK could continue without paying attention to this all, because it's considering on very narrow grands the legitimacy of the US's appeal merits.
According to YahooNews, the some Obama officials looking at reclassifying Assange and related journalists Glen Greenwald and Laura Poitras (who were working on the Snowden documents at the time), as 'information brokers,' which would allow the government to get around a lot of legal guidelines they're expected to follow which prevented them from mounting various types of offensives against the journalists.
A random commenter on this story wrote, "CIA wanted to assassinate a journalist? They're no better than the Saudi's with Jamal Khashoggi if that's the case. DISGUSTING!"
Michael Isikoff, Chief Investigative Correspondent at YahooNews
Show More
Show Less